Two Studies Suggest Lucentis and Avastin Equally Effective in Treating Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
May 29, 2012 Leave a comment
IVAN (UK Study)
In what is considered the largest trial carried out in the UK on eye disease, when compared head-to-head, scientists found Avastin and Lucentis equally effective in treating wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
The most common cause of elderly vision loss is age-related macular degeneration, or AMD. There are two types of AMD, namely dry AMD and wet AMD. The latter is the more severe form of the eye disease. AMD can cause central vision loss, making the ability to read, drive, and recognize faces challenging. In the end, AMD can take away a person’s independence and mobility.
Lucentis, or ranbizumab, has been labeled as the gold standard for treating wet AMD. However, another medication — Avastin (bevacizumab) — indicated for the treatment of various cancers is also commonly used as a more cost effective means to treat wet AMD off-label.
The European study, named IVAN, included 610 people diagnosed with wet AMD in 23 hospitals. The participants were randomly assigned to receive one of the two aforementioned drugs: Avastin and Lucentis. Patients were injected three times per month with the drug in the wet AMD eye, and would receive subsequent injections as needed.
The study findings revealed that the effects on both drugs on preventing vision loss were similar. In addition, one year results indicated that there was no functional difference in vision when the drugs were given as needed versus regularly every month.
IVAN’s study trial is a period of two years. As such, researchers are continuing to follow study participants, and will be delivering a more detailed analysis of the results at the end of the two year study period.
In the UK study, there was a slighly higher rate of heart attacks, strokes in heart failure among the Lucentis users compared to the Avastin users. However, when data from the UK Ivan study was combind with a U.S. CATT (Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials) study (see below), there was no difference in heart attack or strokes between the two medications.
Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials (CATT) study (United States)
In a related study, the Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials (CATT) study, has attested that the cancer drug Avastin is a cost effective treatment for patients suffering from AMD. The latest findings were published in the Journal of Opthalmology based upon two-year study results.
The study concluded that Avastin (bevacizumab) was an equally as good treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration as the 40 times more expensive Lucentis (ranibizumab).
Both the findings of the CATT trial and IVAN study comparison of the two drugs were presented at a Fort Lauderdale, Florida meeting at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) in May.
Pharmacy Headquarters (RxHQ.com) Editorial Staff Copyright 2012 – All rights reserved







